Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From Genetics Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*[[Molecular Genetics]]
 
*[[Molecular Genetics]]
 
*[[Genetic Engineering]]
 
*[[Genetic Engineering]]
*[[Genetics and Ethics]]
 
*[[History of Genetics]]
 
  
However, this kind of division is very arbitrary and heavily influenced by historical progression of the different sub-fields.  There are additional large fields that could be listed, but are not as primary as the divisions above, such as:  
+
However, this kind of division is very arbitrary and heavily influenced by historical progression of the different sub-fields.  There are additional large fields that could be listed, but are not as primary as the divisions above (and some suffer from hyperbole), such as:  
  
 
*[[Ancient DNA]]
 
*[[Ancient DNA]]
 +
*[[Behavioral Genetics]]
 +
*[[Cancer Genetics]]
 
*[[Conservation Genetics]]
 
*[[Conservation Genetics]]
 
*[[Developmental Genetics]]
 
*[[Developmental Genetics]]
 
*[[Ecological Genetics]]
 
*[[Ecological Genetics]]
 
*[[Epigenetics]]
 
*[[Epigenetics]]
 +
*[[Experimental Evolution]]
 +
*[[Gene-Culture Coevolution]]
 
*[[Genetic Anthropology]]
 
*[[Genetic Anthropology]]
 
*[[Human and Medical Genetics]]
 
*[[Human and Medical Genetics]]
 +
*[[Landscape Genetics]]
 
*[[Metagenomics]]
 
*[[Metagenomics]]
 
*[[Microbiome Genetics]]
 
*[[Microbiome Genetics]]
 
*[[Personal Genomics]]
 
*[[Personal Genomics]]
 
*[[Phylogenetics]]
 
*[[Phylogenetics]]
 +
*[[Phylogeography]]
 +
*[[Synthetic Biology]]
 +
*[[Systems Biology]]
 +
 +
There are also fields outside of the natural sciences that interface with genetics. 
 +
 +
*[[Genetics and Ethics]]
 +
*[[Genetics and Laws]]
 +
*[[History of Genetics]]
 +
*[[Teaching Genetics]]
 +
*[[Genetics Research Support]]
  
 
I am purposely avoiding dividing the field by taxonomy (except for human genetics and related fields).  The classical taxonomic divisions of biology are losing their usefulness.  A large part of this is due to genetics and evolution where the same basic principles can apply across a wide range of organisms.  I am also avoiding separating genetics and genomics, some tools and approaches may be different but these are really ends of a continuum that has been artificially exaggerated.   
 
I am purposely avoiding dividing the field by taxonomy (except for human genetics and related fields).  The classical taxonomic divisions of biology are losing their usefulness.  A large part of this is due to genetics and evolution where the same basic principles can apply across a wide range of organisms.  I am also avoiding separating genetics and genomics, some tools and approaches may be different but these are really ends of a continuum that has been artificially exaggerated.   

Latest revision as of 20:24, 29 April 2017

Genetics and Evolution are central to modern biological understanding. Genetics itself is a huge, rapidly changing field and can be divided into several main categories.

Genetics

However, this kind of division is very arbitrary and heavily influenced by historical progression of the different sub-fields. There are additional large fields that could be listed, but are not as primary as the divisions above (and some suffer from hyperbole), such as:

There are also fields outside of the natural sciences that interface with genetics.

I am purposely avoiding dividing the field by taxonomy (except for human genetics and related fields). The classical taxonomic divisions of biology are losing their usefulness. A large part of this is due to genetics and evolution where the same basic principles can apply across a wide range of organisms. I am also avoiding separating genetics and genomics, some tools and approaches may be different but these are really ends of a continuum that has been artificially exaggerated.


One way to get started is by reading about what a gene is, genetic heritability versus environmental effects on phenotype variance, and the structure of DNA.


Maintenance